The latest revisions of the SNIA Computational Storage Architecture and Programming Model Version 0.8 Revision 0 and the Computational Storage API v0.5 rev 0 are now live on the SNIA website. Interested to know what has been added to the specifications, SNIAOnStorage met “virtually” with Jason Molgaard, Co-Chair of the SNIA Computational Storage Technical Work Group, and Bill Martin, Co-Chair of the SNIA Technical Council and editor of the specifications, to get the details.
Both SNIA volunteer leaders stressed that they welcome ideas about the specifications and invite industry colleagues to join them in continuing to define computational storage standards. The two documents are working documents – continually being refined and enhanced. If you are not a SNIA member, you can submit public comments via the SNIA Feedback Portal. To learn if your company is a SNIA member, check the SNIA membership list. If you are a SNIA member, go here to join the Computational Storage Technical Work Group member work area. The Computational Storage Technical Work Group chairs also welcome your emails. Reach out to them at computationaltwg-chair@snia.org.
SNIAOnStorage (SOS): What is the overall objective of the Computational Storage Architecture and Programming Model?
Jason Molgaard (JM): The overall objective of the document is to define recommended behavior for hardware and software that supports computational storage. This is the second release of the Architecture and Programming Model, and it is very stable. While changes are dramatic, this is primarily because of feedback we received both from the public and to a larger extent from new Technical Work Group members who have provided insight and perspective.
SOS: Could you summarize what has changed in the 0.8 version of the Model?
JM: Version 0.8 has four main takeaways:
- It renames the Computational Storage Processor. The component within a Computational Storage Device (CSx) is now called a Computational Storage Engine (CSE). The Computational Storage Processor (CSP) now only refers to a device that contains a Computational Storage Engine (CSE) and no storage.
- It defines a new architectural concept of a Computational Storage Engine Environment (CSEE). This is something that is attached to a specific CSE and defines the environment that a Computational Storage Function (CSF) operates in.
- It defines a new architectural element of a Resource Repository that contains CSEEs that are available for activation on a CSE and also CSFs that are available for activation on a CSEE.
- Discovery and configuration flow are now documented in Version 0.8
SOS: Why did the TWG decide to work on the release of a unique API document?
Bill Martin (BM): The overall objective of the Computational Storage API document is to define an interface between an application and a CSx. Version 0.5 is the first release to the public by the Technical Work Group.
There are three key takeaways from version 0.5:
- The document defines an Application Programming Interface (API) to CSxs
- The API allows a user application on a host to have a consistent interface to any vendor’s CSx.
- A Vendor defines a library for their device that implements the API. Mapping to wire protocol for the device is done by this library. Functions that are not available on a specific CSx may be implemented in software.
SOS: How can vendors use these documents?
BM: The Computational Storage Architecture and Programming Model is what I would categorize as a “descriptive” document. There are no “shalls” or “shoulds” in the document. Rather, the Model is something to use and view the elements they should be considering. It shows the components that are in the architecture, what they mean, and how they interact with each other. This allows users to understand the frameworks and options that can be implemented with a common language and understanding.
The API document, in contrast, is a “prescriptive” document. It describes how to use the elements defined within the architectural document – how to do discovery and configuration, and how to utilize the architecture.
These documents are meant to be used together. Some implementations may not use all of the elements of the architecture, but all of the elements are logically there.
JM: Individuals who are looking to implement computational storage – and who are developing their own computational storage devices – should absolutely review both documents and use them to provide feedback and questions. Many vendors are considering what their computational storage device should look like. This architecture framework provides good guidance and baseline nomenclature we can all use to speak the same language.
SOS: Are there any specific areas where you are looking for feedback?
BM: In the API specification, we’d like feedback on whether or not the discovery should cover everything implementers want to discover about a CSx. We’d like more depth and details and what things people think they want to discover about a device. We’d also like comments on items that need to be added on how you interact with the devices to execute a Computational Storage Function (CSF).
JM: For the Model, we’d like feedback on whether people see the value of this descriptive document and are actually following it. We’d like to know if there are additional ideas or interests of definition that users want to see when constructing architectures, or whether there are gaps in defined activities.
SOS: Where can folks find out more information about the Specifications?
BM: We invite everyone to attend the upcoming SNIA Storage Developer Conference (SDC) . We will be virtual this year on September 28 and 29. Registrants can view 12 presentations on computational storage, including a Computational Storage Update from the Working Group that the Co-Chairs of the Computational Storage TWG, Scott Shadley and Jason Molgaard, are presenting, one I will be giving on Computational Storage Moving Forward with an Architecture and API, and another by my Computational Storage TWG colleague Oscar Pinto on Computational Storage APIs.
And anyone with interest in computational storage can attend an open discussion during SDC on computational storage advances that will be featured in a Birds-of-a-Feather session via Zoom on September 29 at 4:00 pm Pacific. Go here to learn how to attend this SDC special event and all the Birds-of-a-Feather sessions.
SOS: Thanks to you both. Our readers may want to know that SNIA’s work in computational storage is led by the 250+ volunteer vendor members of the Computational Storage Technical Work Group. In addition to these two specifications, the TWG has also updated computational storage terms in the Online SNIA Dictionary.
The SNIA Computational Storage Special Interest Group accelerates the awareness of computational storage concepts and influences industry adoption and implementation of the technical specifications and programming models. Learn more at http://www.snia.org/cmsi